What was asked?
Broader access, transparency, independent research and public scrutiny across open-source and open-science approaches.
Who would need to act?
Research funders, developers and policymakers
What would count as delivery?
Documented access for independent work, plus evidence about both benefits and misuse.
What the record currently supports
A 2024 position paper proposes assessing the marginal risks of open models. It is a related research development, not proof that the statement’s goals were delivered.
The evidence trail
Original position published
AI Safety and OpennessRelated research
On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation ModelsResearch context, not implementation evidence.
Added to the archive
The record preserves the question. An absence of assessed follow-up is not a finding that no action occurred.