The request, in plain language.
Tiered federal licensing, independent evaluations, a public oversight body and wider participation in policymaking.
The letter conditions advanced-system deployment on developers demonstrating safety, fairness, reliability and benefits exceeding risks.
The implementation question
Can meaningful oversight avoid becoming a barrier to independent scrutiny?
A question for inquiry, not a finding about the authors’ intentions.
Keep the source and the reading apart.
This record summarizes a published position. The links below connect it to related documents, available research and an open follow-through record. Inclusion is not an endorsement, and a request is not proof of action.
Explore the evidence
Model evaluation for extreme risksRead the inquiry
Who checks the checkers?Read across subjects
Editorial reading suggestions; shared themes do not establish agreement or influence.
What happened afterwards?
Open the follow-through recordTry the mechanism
The accountability labRecord history
25 Sept 2026 · Source-linked summary added to the archive. Original publication: 25 Oct 2023. Full subtitle: On Addressing Both Present Harms and Emerging Threats. Full source text has not been republished or preserved as a historical capture in this edition.