The request, in plain language.
Protected criticism, anonymous reporting and safeguards against retaliation under specified conditions.
The letter protects public risk-related criticism while recognizing intellectual-property interests. It seeks protection for confidential disclosures after other reporting processes fail, and allows public reporting when adequate anonymous channels do not exist.
The implementation question
Can workers raise concerns through a process they can trust?
A question for inquiry, not a finding about the authors’ intentions.
Keep the source and the reading apart.
This record summarizes a published position. The links below connect it to related documents, available research and an open follow-through record. Inclusion is not an endorsement, and a request is not proof of action.
Explore the evidence
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language ModelsRead the inquiry
A right to speak needs somewhere to go.Read across subjects
Editorial reading suggestions; shared themes do not establish agreement or influence.
What happened afterwards?
Open the follow-through recordTry the mechanism
The accountability labRecord history
25 Sept 2026 · Source-linked summary added to the archive. Original publication: 4 Jun 2024. Launch date of the public letter. Full source text has not been republished or preserved as a historical capture in this edition.