Where do we part ways?
Keep the ambition fixed: decisions that can be challenged. Change the arrangement and inspect the questions it creates.
What does accountability
depend on here?
01 / Authority
An independent body makes the decision. Its competence, resources and conflicts of interest become part of the accountability question.
02 / Access
Qualified outside researchers can examine evidence under a defined process. Access rules, exclusion decisions and publication rights need scrutiny.
03 / Challenge
A public appeal route makes disagreement inspectable. It needs resources, fair access and a recipient empowered to act.
A concrete next question
Can a person outside the institution identify an error, submit evidence and obtain a reasoned response that changes the decision?
This is a qualitative teaching tool, not a model of real-world outcomes. Choices do not establish what any source author or signatory would accept. The URL preserves the arrangement; nothing is submitted.
AI Licensing for a Better Future
Related inquiry: Who checks the checkers? · Research: Model evaluation for extreme risks